Don't HR Alone #37 - Missouri Tax Updates, Changes in Women's benefits, and Salary History Q
Missouri tax rates to go down in 2018 — MISSOURI — Withholding and Reporting
A majority of Missouri residents and small business owners will see their personal income tax bills go down in 2018, according to Missouri Sen. Will Kraus. Pursuant to S.B. 509, Laws 2014, beginning in 2017, if net general revenue collected in the previous fiscal year exceeds the amount collected in any one of the three previous years by at least $150 million, the top Missouri personal income tax rate will go down by 0.1%, and a personal income tax deduction will be allowed equal to 5% of business income. The trigger point for these tax cuts was recently met. The legislation provides for increasing tax cuts over a five-year period, provided the revenue target continues to be met each year. In the event of another economic downturn, the tax cuts will stop until revenue increases again. (News Release, Missouri Sen. Will Kraus, July 10, 2017.)
SHRM survey shows some women’s benefits rise while others fall — SURVEY RESULTS
According to the Society for Human Resource Management’s newly released Employee Benefits Survey, 30 percent of organizations currently provide paid maternity leave beyond what is covered by short-term disability or state law, an increase from 26 percent in 2016. Fewer employers on the other hand—24 percent—offer paternity leave. However, while some women’s benefits are on the rise others are on the decline. For example, contraceptive coverage has decreased by 7 percentage points compared to just five years ago.
Additional findings include:
Two-thirds of women (66 percent) use all paid maternity leave, while far fewer male employees used all available paternity leave. In fact, female employees were almost twice as likely as men to use all parental/family leave.
On-site lactation rooms (42 percent) increased 8 percentage points compared with 2013.
75 percent of employers said they offer contraceptive coverage compared to 82 percent in 2013.
Only one-quarter (24 percent) of employers offer in-vitro fertilization coverage compared to 30 percent in 2013
Only one quarter (26 percent) of employers offer infertility treatment coverage other than in-vitro fertilization.
The survey polled 3,227 HR professionals from a randomly selected sample of SHRM’s membership.
Source: Society for Human Resource Management.
Majority of U.S. workers believe employers should not ask about salary history — SURVEY RESULTS
According to a new survey from Glassdoor, more than half of U.S. workers (53 percent) believe employers should not ask candidates about their current or past salary history when negotiating a job offer. This survey, conducted online by Harris Poll on behalf of Glassdoor among more than 1,300 U.S. adults ages 18 and older, comes at a time when new laws are being adopted to address this inherent gender bias in long-standing hiring practices. Several states and cities are currently considering laws that would ban employers from asking about salary history, following similar laws recently passed in New York City, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Massachusetts, Delaware and Oregon, among others.
Significantly more working women (60 percent) than working men (48 percent) believe salary history questions should not be asked. On average, women in the U.S. earn about $0.76 for every $1.00 men earn on an unadjusted basis, according to Glassdoor Economic Research. This documented pay gap, compounded by the fact that more than two-thirds (68 percent) of women do not negotiate pay compared to half (52 percent) of men, can quickly put women at pay disadvantages, especially when prior salary history is used to determine starting pay in job offers.
"The time of looking backward to go forward to determine pay is over. Asking prior salary history questions can trigger unintended consequences and introduce bias into the hiring process that disadvantages women from day one," said Dawn Lyon, Glassdoor chief equal pay advocate and senior vice president of global corporate affairs. "We need to reframe the conversation to pay expectations around the value of the job and the skills and relevant experience required to do it. Many companies are already doing this without legislation or regulation because it's the right thing to do. And, candidates can help change the conversation by offering answers that address their pay expectations based on the role and their current market value, while also taking into account how the company structures its overall pay and benefits package."
While most Americans do not think employers should ask about current or past pay, most do want more pay information up front from employers. Nearly all U.S. workers (98 percent) say it would be helpful to see pay ranges included in open job listings, and 95 percent say it is important to be thoughtful and informed about a company's pay philosophy (e.g., how pay and pay increases are determined) prior to accepting a job offer. This is valuable for employers to consider given that nearly three in four U.S. workers (72 percent) report that a salary and compensation package is among their top considerations when determining whether to accept a job offer.
"Pay is a key area where implicit bias can creep into people processes," said Lori Nishiura Mackenzie, executive director of the Clayman Institute for Gender Research at Stanford University. "Women are often implicitly assumed to be less qualified and thus, have to work harder to demonstrate their worth, especially in roles that are male-dominated. The same negotiation tactics can have different returns for different employees depending on their race, gender, and other dimensions. Due to stereotypes and bias, past salary is not an accurate measure of an employee's value and putting all the onus on the candidate to negotiate their salary is not the answer either. It is critical to base offers on what the job is worth, starting with clear criteria and qualifications for the role when making decisions about a total compensation package."